MENU

Agile Work News

  • Oxford Economics study explains why leaders aren’t addressing office noise

    How smart companies are rewriting the rules of the open workplace

    Source: www.oxfordeconomics.com

    This study of 600 executives and 600 employees shows a big disconnect between how each group sees the problem of office noise. While only 35% of executives say noise reduces their employees’ satisfaction and productivity, over half (50%) of employees say it does. The report suggests the problem may lie in the fact that executives don’t feel the pain. Sixty-two percent still have private offices, compared to only 14% of employees. 

     

    The study also uncovers the need for better remote work tools, technology integration, and a clearer understanding of work-life boundaries.

    Continue reading →
  • What Canadians like, dislike, need, want from their workplaces & even their facilities managers

    This study, conducted by Staples, included over 500 Canadian employees. 

    Source: www.staplesbusinessadvantage.ca

    The report covers a wide range of topics and is well worth reading if you’re interested in what’s happening in Canadian work trends. It includes a surprise section on what employees want and expect from their facility managers and how they feel about their offices.

     

    Highlights of the Facilities Management (FM) section:

    – 82% of employees feel their FM plays a role in their success

    – 59% say FMs are underappreciated

    – 65% say the FMs role should be strategic and they should be given maximum resources to get their job done

     

    Other Highlights:

    – Only 29% of employers offer agile seating

    – 38% work in open space, 38% work in semi-open space, and 23% work in mostly closed offices

    – 66% spend some of their time working outside the office. Of those 48% sometime work at home and 17% sometimes work in co-working spaces

    – 48% say the look and feel of the office space is a major factor in selecting an employer

     

    Other topics covered in the study include:

    • Workplace distractions
    • Health and wellness
    • Seasonal and vacation habits
    Continue reading →
  • Nearly all professionals say they need flexibility, but only half say their job offers it

    "In our study on flexibility in the modern workforce, we set out to determine whether a gap exists between flexibility supply and demand. In other words, how many people need flexibility, and how many people actually have it? To find out, we surveyed 1,583 white-collar professionals representative of the U.S. workforce at large."

    Source: hbr.org

    While more than 9 out of 10 professionals surveyed say they want flexibility in when and where they work, less than half have it. The study also found:

    • Only 29% felt the way the worked was sustainable over time
    • Only 37% felt inspired by their workspace
    • Only 29% said they brought their whole self to work

     

    Respondents without flexibility were:

    • 2x more likely to quit
    • 2x more likely to be dissatisfied with work 
    • Had employee net promoter scores 48 points lower

     

    The study suggests a wide range of flexible work options including flexible hours, flexible location, reduced travel, and part-time work. 

     

     

    Continue reading →
  • Vermont will pay employees $10k to move there and telecommute

    "The money — part of a grant program designed to draw tech workers and revitalize the state’s aging work force — is intended to help with costs like relocation, computer software and hardware, broadband access and membership in a shared professional space."

    Source: www.nytimes.com

    Desperate to renew its dwindling population, Vermont will pay people up to $10k (over 2 years) to establish a permanent home there. The only catch is they have to work remotely for an out of state company. Funding is limited, so grab your skies, pick your cheese, and head on over to their website.

    Continue reading →
  • Fifth biennial benchmarking study reveals big shifts in workplace strategy

    Many of what we once considered alternative workplace strategies, have now become mainstream. Now in its fifth year, this benchmarking study was conducted by Advanced Workplace Associates (AWA), Global Workplace Analytics, and Haworth Inc., and additionally supported by Workplace Evolutionaries, a community of practice within the International Facilities Management Association. Over 130 organizations representing over 2.3 million global employees responded. The results were compared to longitudinal data collected across four similar surveys fielded since 2008.

    Source: globalworkplaceanalytics.com

    The ‘Once Alternative Workplace Strategies Report’, reveals significant changes in how and where people work. Some of the more interesting findings include:

    • The worry over a loss in productivity when people are able to work anywhere is entirely unfounded.
    • People impacts, rather than cost savings, are now the primary measure of success
    • Internal mobility has more than doubled since 2008; External mobility (working at home, coworking places, outside the office) has remained flat
    • Nearly half of employees are still permanently assigned to one space; no change since 2008
    • Employee involvement in the planning, implementation, and evaluation of workplace change programs has decreased significantly

    The free 50+ page report can be downloaded at http://we.ifma.org/resources/we-research/.

    Continue reading →
  • Do you have a hard time getting stuff done just before a meeting? Here’s the reason and a solution.

    You’ve got a full hour until your next meeting. But you probably won’t make the most of that time, new research suggests. In a series of eight studies, both in the lab and real life, researchers found that free time seems shorter to people when it comes before a task or appointment on their calendar.

    Source: www.sciencedaily.com

    According to a study in the Journal of Consumer Research, free time seems shorter when it precedes a meeting, appointment, or even lunch with a friend.

    So, if you ask a person how much time they had to read in a free hours, on average they’d say 50 minutes. They pad it with a "just in case factor." If they have a meeting scheduled an hour from now, they double the padding and estimate 40 minutes. These results were consistent with real life studies and, by the way, the opposite was true also. People get more done when their time is not bounded by stop time. 

     

    So how do we get that time back? The author has two suggestions: 1) stack meetings close together for part of the day and leave the balance for unbounded work, and 2) train yourself to remember you actually have more time than you think.

    Continue reading →
  • Is business travel killing you?

    "Americans took more than 500 million domestic business trips in 2016. And while many workplace health programs for business travel provide immunizations, information about avoiding food-borne illness, and alerts about civil or political unrest, few focus on a more a common threat to health: the stress, sleep interruption, unhealthy eating and drinking, and lack of exercise that are common side effects of being on the road."

    Source: hbr.org

    The study found that compared to those who spent 6 nights or less away from home, those who traveled for business 14 or more nights a month had higher body mass scores and were more likely to report symptoms of anxiety, depression, alcohol dependence, physical inactivity, and poor sleep. For extreme travelers, those who spent 21 or more nights a month traveling for business, were 92% more likely to be obese.

     

    The HBR article suggests employers:

    • Rethink the need for employee travel
    • Increase employee awareness of the need to eat, exercise and sleep well while traveling
    • Provide stress management and sleep hygiene training
    • Book travelers at hotels that offer fitness options and/or provide gym memberships they can use wherever they travel

     

    Continue reading →
  • Has the link between happiness and productivity been proven? Yes.

    "Some firms say they care about the well-being and “happiness” of their employees. But are such claims hype or scientific good sense? We provide evidence, for a classic piece rate setting, that happiness

    makes people more productive."

    Source: www.journals.uchicago.edu

    This rigorously academic study,  showed employee happiness predicted a 10-12% increase in productivity across three different styles of experiment. The opposite proved true as well. 

     

    Continue reading →
  • Rigorous study measures dramatic improvement in employee performance factors following 2.5 day well-being course 

    "Programs focused on employee well-being have gained momentum in recent years, but few have been rigorously evaluated. This study evaluates the effectiveness of an intervention designed to enhance vitality and purpose in life by assessing changes in employee quality of life (QoL) and health-related behaviors."

    Source: journals.sagepub.com

    Johnson & Johnson’s Human Performance Institute teamed up with Tufts University to study the impact of an intensive 2.5 day well-being intervention that focused on energy management. Six months later, they measured marked improvements in participants’ vitality, general health, mental health, social functioning, sense of purpose, and sleep quality.

     

    It’s a heavy read with 10 authors, 48 footnotes, and a heap of statistics, but it’s an important one. It shows, among other things, that we need to measure what matters. Though wellness interventions have scored poorly in reducing medical expenses, their ability to improve employee performance could be far more impactful.

    Continue reading →
  • Automation and its impact on the workforce: Results from a survey of 900+ global employers

    The 2017 – 2018 Willis Towers Watson Global Future of Work Survey reveals how employers are moving beyond workplace automation myths as they determine how to manage the many emerging work options, from contingent labor to AI and robotics. It examines not only where breakthroughs are needed but also how to plot a course of action.

    Source: www.willistowerswatson.com

    The results of this Towers Watson survey suggest employers are unprepared for how automation will change the nature of work, the workforce, and how both are managed: 

    • 27% of respondents say they require fewer employees due to automation today; that jumps to 49% by 2020.
    • Respondents said 83% of work is currently being done by full-time employees. They expect this to drop to 77% by 2020. Work performed by the following categories of talent is expected to rise during that timeframe: Part-timers (7% now, 10% in 2020),  free agents (4% now, 6% by 2020), workers on loan from other organizations (1% today, 2% in 2020), free agents from online talent platforms (.2% now, 1% in 2020). Work performed by consultants and outside agencies is expected remain flat at 4%. 
    • 69% or respondents feel automation and the changing workforce mix will require breakthrough approaches in performance management. Over two-thirds say it will require new organizational structures.
    • More than a third of employers say they are unprepared to deconstruct jobs toward identifying which tasks can be automated.
    • Over half say automation increases workplace flexibility today; 68% say it will do so in 2020.
    • 38% say they are unprepared for the task of re-skilling those who will be effected by automation.
    • 45% say by 2020 they will be redesigning jobs so the can be done by people with higher skills, 42% say they will be doing the same so jobs can be done by people with lower skills.

     

    Their report elaborates on the following suggested course of action:

    • Understand how technology and automation will impact work
    • Define the re-skilling pathways
    • Lead the change to new ways of working
    Continue reading →